Is Your Revival Centre a
‘Cult’?
Adapted from Identifying a Cult by Jan Groenveld
Compiled by Troy Waller
If you tell a Revivalist that
their group is a cult, they often reply with something along the lines of, “The
Church of the apostles’ day was also called a cult!” or “Jesus was called a
cult leader too!” Some have heard RCI and Geelong Revival Centre pastors say
something along these lines numerous times. It seems that some Revivalists
think that to call the Revival Centres a cult is to align them with Jesus and
the early Church.
On the other hand, some
Revivalists take great offence and get most upset when you call their church a
cult. They think that we are accusing them of all sorts of crimes, simply by
calling them a cult. So why do we get such varied reactions when we label the
Revival Centres groups as cults?
It all has to do with
definitions. You see, the word ‘cult’, as with a lot of English words today,
has a few different meanings. The word can be used in various ways in various
contexts. There are three major definitions.
What is a
Cult?
1. The Secular
Definition
CULT - From the Latin “cultis” which denotes
all that is involved in worship, ritual, emotion, liturgy and attitude. This
definition is not concerned with specific doctrines or behaviours but actually
denotes what we call denominations and sects. By this definition, all
religious movements are cults. This is the definition that can be applied to
the early Church and Jesus as its leader.
Obviously this website is not
concerned with the Revival Centres as denominations or sects.
2. Christian
Definition
CULT - Any group which deviates from
Biblical, orthodox, historical Christianity. That is they deny things such as
the Trinity, or Deity of Christ. Some deny Jesus’ physical resurrection; His
personal and physical return to earth or salvation by FAITH alone. This
definition is concerned with the beliefs of specific groups and not so much
with behaviour.
This definition only covers
those groups which defined as cults doctrinally from the perspective of
the Christian Church. This includes the Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses. This
term does not refer to other world religions such as Islam and Hinduism.
We do define the Revival Centres
as a cult from this perspective as they have a different view from historical
Christianity on issues such as salvation and the Trinity.
3. The
Modern Definition
CULT - Any group which has a hierarchical authoritarian
leadership structure with all teaching and guidance coming from the person/persons
at the top. The group will claim to be the only way to God; Nirvana; Paradise;
Ultimate Reality; Full Potential, Way to Happiness etc, and will use behavioural,
information, thought and emotional control techniques to gain control and keep
their members.
This definition is concerned
primarily with the behaviour of the group in question. It covers cults
within all major world religions, along with those cults which have no obvious
religious base such as commercial, educational and psychological cults.
Different cults operate in
different ways. For example, some are more prone to information control than
emotional control or vice versa. Some cults are less extreme than others in
some areas of control but these are still cults nonetheless.
This website does present the
RCI and its splinter groups as this kind of cult. Let’s expand on this
definition and see how the Revival Centres fit or don’t fit this model.
Identification
Marks of a Cult
(a) The group will have an elitist
view of itself in relation to others, and a unique cause. (THEY ARE THE ONLY
ONES RIGHT - everyone else is wrong. THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES DOING GOD’S WILL -
everyone else is in apostasy. )
(b) They will promote their
cause actively, and in doing so, abuse God-given personal rights and freedoms.
This abuse can be SPIRITUAL, SOCIAL & PSYCHOLOGICAL.
They do this through the
following means,
- Their
leader/s may claim a special, exclusive ministry, revelation or position
of authority given by God.
The Revival
Centres believe that the Church at large (Pentecostal or otherwise) has fallen
into apostasy. They openly teach that the ‘truth’ about salvation was
re-discovered by Lloyd Longfield or Noel Hollins, (depending on which Revival
Centre group you belong to) just after the World War II. They now believe that
they promote the true formula for salvation (Acts 2:38 as
they interpret it) and those that preach salvation by faith alone are apostate.
- They
believe they are the only true church and take a critical stance regarding
the Christian church while at the same time praising and exalting their
own group, leader/s and work.
The Revival
Centres leaders will rarely come out and say that their church is the only true
church. But this is very much implied and members know that to leave the
Revival Centre is to lose your salvation. Much is said in talks from the
platform and in official literature which denigrates and disparages other
churches, even those that believe in speaking in tongues.
They will even
question the salvation of those who leave one Revival Centre splinter group for
another, even though they all preach the same salvation formula. The Geelong
Revival Centre members are even told that other Revival Centre groups preach a
different salvation message to them. This is a blatant lie, as they all teach
the same salvation formula.
- They
use intimidation or psychological manipulation to keep members loyal to
their ranks. This could be in the form of threats of dire calamity sent by
God if they leave; certain death at Armageddon; being shunned by their
family and friends etc.
As mentioned
earlier, all Revival Centre members know that to leave the Revival Centres is
to lose your salvation and go to hell. Even people who leave to attend other
Pentecostal Churches are said to have ‘fallen away’.
The Revival
Centre preoccupation with Armageddon and nuclear devastation rivals only the
Jehovah’s Witnesses’ use of the ‘imminent return of Jesus and destruction of
the world’ as a means to promote fear and maintain members. Some ex-members of
the Revival Centres report having had terrifying nightmares of nuclear
holocaust while in the group and after leaving.
The Revival
Centres spread half truths and lies about those who have left even saying
ex-members fall gravely ill and die. One ex-member said that he heard a pastor
pronounce this upon people who had just left the church. Stories of those who
fall into addictions and immoral behaviour (true or not) upon leaving the group
are also lauded in front of those still in the group.
Shunning is also
a common experience for those who leave. Current members are expected to
discontinue relationships with ex-members. Both the RCI and RF make their position clear,
MARK THEM - identify those who cause divisions and
offences. The most obvious are former members who left over personal
grievances. Their doctrine and practice are not what we have learned from our Bibles.
Identify them - don't be sentimental about old fellowships. (Separation - The
Revival Fellowship)
16. Any member who has been
“disciplined” by the oversight should not be “comforted” by well-meaning
friends. This can encourage rebellion and could result in disaster for those
concerned. Any member who has been permanently or temporarily “de-barred” from
fellowship should not be visited without permission from the oversight. It is
most important that their “case” should not be discussed with them or with
others. If and when such action is taken, the Assembly will be officially
advised of the reason for such measures. (RCI Assembly Guidelines)
Many an
ex-Revival Centre member can tell you stories of having to shun those who left
before them and then being shunned when they themselves left. Some are even shunned
by family members. One ex-member even reported being ex-communicated herself
after a former member’s car was seen in her driveway by a ‘spying’ member of
the oversight.
- Members
will be expected to give substantial financial support to the group. This
could be compulsory tithing (which is checked); signing over all their
property on entering the group; coercive methods of instilling guilt on
those who have not contributed; selling magazines, flowers or other goods
for the group as part of their “ministry”. At the same time bible-based
cults may ridicule churches that take up free-will offerings by passing
collection plates and/or sell literature and tapes. They usually brag that
they don’t do this. This gives outsiders the intimation that they are not
interested in money.
The Revival
Centres are staunch tithers. However in fairness to them, they do not usually
expect their members to contribute over and above this tithe except in some
circumstances such as a fund raising drives for a new project (such as the RCI
purchase of the Freshwater Creek Camp in Victoria). They
do not force their members to sell books, etc. outside of the church, but there
have been some reports of heavy handed tactics over money in the CAI.
- There
will be great emphasis on loyalty to the group and its teachings. The
lives of members will be totally absorbed into the group’s activities.
They will have little or no time to think for themselves because of
physical and emotional exhaustion. This is also a vital part of the thought
control process.
In this way the
Revival Centres are not as severe as groups like the Moonies or Hare Krishna.
However, the RCI do expect people to attend 2 Sunday meetings, 1 weekly house
meeting or mid-week meeting, weekly young people’s meetings (if at an
appropriate age or unmarried) and any outreaches or special events. Some
Revival Centre groups have a heavier schedule again. These meetings are forced
upon members and are not optional.
Unknown to most
members, lower level RCI leaders even take a roll to check who is and is not in
attendance. Missing members are then sometimes questioned as to why they are
skipping meetings. Christmas and Easter camps are also usually compulsory
unless an adequate reason for not being able to attend is given. This busy
schedule leaves little time for meaningful relationships outside the group and
brings members deeper into the group dynamic.
- There
will be total control over almost all aspects of the private lives of
members. This control can be direct through communal living, or constant
and repetitious teaching on “how to be a true Christian” or “being
obedient to leadership”. Members will look to their leaders for guidance
in everything they do.
The Revival
Centres have a list of written Assembly Guidelines (i.e. RULES!) that members
are expected to strictly adhere to. The preamble to the RCI list states,
The following guidelines are for the
protection of individuals and the assembly as a whole… ...All policies are
international and are not subject to local change or variation.
The list
contains rules covering things such as private gatherings of members (not allowed
without permission from leaders), marriage (again, permission is needed) and the
repression of critical comments. The full list can be found here.
A quick read of
these rules demonstrates the invasiveness of the Revival Centres groups into
the lives of their members. This behaviour by the groups undermines the
individual’s personal freedom and eventually their ability to make even simple
decisions for themselves.
- Bible-based
cults may proclaim they have no clergy/laity distinction and no paid
ministry class - that they are all equal.
The Revival
Centres members like to point the finger at the clergy/laity distinction of
other churches, especially the Catholic Church, whilst claiming that their
leaders are just ‘normal people’. However, every single Revivalist knows that
the ‘oversight’ are much more than ‘normal members’. Members are forced
to address pastors as Pastor (e.g. Pastor Bill) and never by their first name
alone and, as mentioned, have enormous power over regular members. They do pay
some ministers a wage.
- Any
dissent or questioning of the group’s teachings is discouraged. Criticism
in any form is seen as rebellion. There will be an emphasis on authority,
unquestioning obedience and submission. This is vigilantly maintained.
Anyone who has
been in the Revival Centres for even a few months knows that criticism and
dissention is not tolerated in the slightest. Numerous stories have been
reported by ex-members of the harsh and often emotionally damaging ways that
the pastors and oversight have treated people who have crossed this line. The
guidelines mentioned earlier make the Revival Centres position quite clear:
5. Members should not enter into any
conversation criticising doctrines, practices or beliefs held by the assembly.
Again, Pastors and Elders are ready to discuss any such problems that may
arise.
10. Any case of disloyalty towards
the Assembly or spreading of any discord whatsoever will be viewed as
“divisionary” and dealt with severely.
24. Members must not enter into any
controversy or criticisms of the beliefs or practices of other persons in other
Assemblies. Any “different” teachings should be reported to the home Pastor
who can communicate with other Pastors if necessary.
You
cannot question Revival Centre doctrine as a member. If the Revival Centres
have declared something as true then you must accept it wholeheartedly or be
prepared to be ‘dealt with severely’. Once the pastor or elder has discussed
the matter with you then the matter is closed whether you accept their
explanation or not.
- Members
are required to demonstrate their loyalty to the group in some way. This
could be in the form of “dobbing” on fellow members (including family)
under the guise of looking out for their “spiritual welfare”. They may be
required to deliberately lie (heavenly deception) or give up their lives
by refusing some form of medical treatment.
Members of the
Revival Centres are encouraged to report any violation of policy or practice by
other members to the leaders immediately. This is under the guise of “caring
for brothers and sisters”. Husbands, wives and even children are encouraged to
report on each other. We have had no reports of deliberate lying being
encouraged, but I was present in a Young People’s meeting where we were trained
to give our public testimony. In this talk, the oversight member instructed us
to leave out any undesirable information about church life such as
ex-communication, people leaving to go to other churches or personal struggle
with ‘sin’.
- Attempts
to leave or reveal embarrassing facts about the group may be met with
threats. Some may have taken oaths of loyalty that involve their lives or
have signed a “covenant” and feel threatened by this. Refugees of the
group are usually faced with confrontations by other members with coercion
to get them to return to the group.
Put simply, there is no good way
to leave the Revival Centres. There is no valid reason to leave from the
perspective of the leadership. When individuals leave they are disparaged,
sometimes publicly, by leaders. Half-truths and rumours are spread amongst the
members to discredit those who leave. The organisation is never at fault in
minor or major parting of ways, it is always the fault of those who have left.
Noel Hollins said that he parted ways with the RCI as they ‘no longer wanted to
follow the Lord’ and Lloyd Longfield said that the ‘Spirit is weak’ in the
Revival Fellowships. Members have reported a heavy handed approach from
leaders who were attempting to deter them from leaving the group.
Conclusion
This article has not tried to
manipulate the facts to make the Revival Centres fit the pattern of a
destructive cult. It didn’t need to. Anyone who has been involved with a
Revival Centre for even a short while can testify to seeing many, if not all,
of the things discussed here. Sure, not all these points will be found in
every Revival Centre group. But all Revival Centre groups will have some, if
not most of them, and these may vary to some degree. And pointing out these
marks in other groups doesn’t make the Revival Centres any less a cult. It
only means there are other groups out there warranting a similar
investigation. But most churches don’t exhibit enough of these signs to be
labelled a cult as we labelled the Revival Centres in this article.
So, is your Revival Centre a
cult?
Copyright
2003. Troy Waller. Original article, ‘Identifying a Cult’ Copyright 1985,
1995. Jan Groenveld.
|